About your Search

20130504
20130512
SHOW
Book TV 30
Hannity 13
( more )
STATION
SFGTV 170
FOXNEWSW 134
SFGTV2 128
CNNW 126
MSNBCW 122
FBC 83
KGO (ABC) 73
CSPAN2 72
CSPAN 70
KPIX (CBS) 52
KNTV (NBC) 42
KTVU (FOX) 39
KQED (PBS) 34
KRON (MyNetworkTV) 27
KRCB (PBS) 23
CNBC 20
( more )
LANGUAGE
English 1310
Search Results 0 to 49 of about 1,312 (some duplicates have been removed)
, steven harper -- stephen harper, adjunct professor argues that the law profession is in need of reform. mr. harper argues that there is an over abundance of lawyers and reports that, according to estimates by the bureau of labor statistics, 45,000 law students graduate each year, and 73,600 legal jobs will be created this decade. this is about an hour. >> it turns out that lawyers -- by the way, what i am going to do is talk from between yourself minutes. i'll stop center if you start nodding off, and then what i hope happens is that fairly soon into might comments you will start thinking about things that will cause you to have a question to or may be challenged things that i have to say. that is perfectly fine. as a lot more interesting to me than to hear my own voice. turns out that lawyers leave a lot of contests that no one wants to win. we are among the most clinically depressed profession. we lead in categories like substance abuse and alcoholism and end distress generally. and when you say that to people, when i say that to people it generates some interesting responses. one re
agreement among its international law scholars that the use of lethal force is permissible under international law, and human-rights law, in response to a specific concrete and imminent threat. in the law of war context, when you are in an armed conflict, it would be permissible against civilians who are directly participating in hostilities, as those terms are defined under the laws of war and as long as other requirements are met. what has been made public in speeches by administration officials -- and i do appreciate that the speeches have been made -- alice well as the white paper that was first leaked -- is that those are not the standards being applied. if you look at the white paper alone -- remember that this was a summary of a legal memo used to justify the killing of a u.s. citizen who was a senior operational and al qaeda leader -- the restrictions that the white paper recognizes, for example, on what constitutes imminent threat, feasibility of requirements,r what appear to be limitations are in fact permissions. it turns out that the senior high level official who is
that it was a gift and we believe we are within the law. >> the fpbc it's a gift but we have the 801 that if it's a gift for the benefit of the individual that would require an 801. you don't believe that's the case? >> that's incorrect. the 803 is a different track. it's a gift that is in this case for the benefit of the city. we consulted with the fpcc. this is an 803 as a gift. we have filed the proper forms. this is a state law and we are within the state law according to the body that regulates this process. >> i understand. just asking about the 801. the words i got from mr. gibner if the department receives a gift and whether that would require an 801 and it would seem like it would, but i'm sure if it's a firm requirement or if it's a good thing to do. can you answer that question? >> you seem to not be totally firm about whether it's a mandate of something whether it should be done. >> it is a mandate when a department receives a gift that benefits an employer or officer that the department must file an 801 or if the department doesn't file an 801 then the gift is a personal gift to th
, and rick and rich and john and sabrina and mike. mike, is this a good law? >> david, i am not familiar with the precise details of the law. one thing we have a sentence to work. work, the states that give the shortest dureration and lower unemployment rates to the state that is give unemployment . i am for the plan. >> steve, should workers fired for sleeping on the job receive unemployment benefits. >> the law is trying to do and it is it a nice concept and it is going to be tough to work . latch on to this. >> and this is rheums and conditions. the trial lawyer saying you should have done this and that . nice concept. it is extremely difficult to execute. >> sabrina a good law or bad one. >> i love it and those who manage would the organization and i know what a drain it can be. >> i am in favor of inviting them to will the work. i am not sure it is much to change employee conduct. >> rich, if i am a boss and someone is litserally sleeping on want job . if fire the person for doing that. do they deserve umployment benefits? >> probably not. sabrina and steve pointed out what does the
summary of the laws. the ada, calif. building code, the civil rights, and our experts here will elaborate. we also have a list of certified caps at work in san francisco for you. carla johnson with the mayor's office of disability has created a really good it died of out to interview your experts to make sure you are getting the best quality product for you. been next -- the money you pay for the inspection you can take as a tax deduction. any money that if you have taken can be applied as a tax deduction. this can be done on an annual basis. next, the opportunity, and a fund -- opportunity loan fund, providing for small businesses to pay for the inspection or to make improvements needed. to do it before you receive the lawsuit. and lastly, we of the bar association and their resources. they're providing their legal service for you. this last thing i am going to share with you in terms of what we have seen in our office is that with the individuals, that does not necessarily mean an individual will follow up with a lawsuit. what we've seen in our office is the individual's will send you a
'm not suggesting the previous presidents did a good job of enforcing the law but they didn't manufacture immigration law out of up the air. but this one did he created it. now senators and members in this house also are advocating that there is ke e-- that there is de facto amnesty and the only thing we can to is conform the laws to the amnesty the president has manufactured out of thin air. that's the same thing as conforming this congress to an order by the supreme court. this congress is the final answer on this. whether it's a disagreement with the supreme court, whether it's a disagreement with the executive branch, the house and the senate operating together envisioned by our founding fathers would be, we'll sort this out, if we have to in the end, when there's a constitutional clash, and a tug of war, that is sorted out by the people expressing their judgment at the ballot box. that's how you eventually resolve serious constitutional crises. so so we have a constitutional serious concern. i'm not to the point where we say it's a crisis at this point, but, mr. speaker, the presiden
there are different needs in different communities? and i think perhaps the law enforcement folks feel the cultures in the communities and see that come out in the adults. i would like to hear about how do you affect a culture and even in san francisco we have many cultures affecting what is valued, what is criticized. >> you know i think that richard touched upon this. it's a relationship of power and it's clearly going to differ from community to community; right. when i was telling you i was picked because because i didn't speak english or at all initially there were only about 5% of us that were hispanic in the school and wouldn't be the case if 95% are hispanic and english speaking as a second language, but i think the way that we can deal with the issue is we ought to first of all start with the notion of respect for others, and respect for others can work across the line. it doesn't necessarily mean -- it doesn'tly has to deal with the culture. is how we treat one another? and i think we have to be very clear in our educational process and the communication to our people and what is accep
or the law. those 4 things. liver, livelihood, lover and law. within those l's is when somebody shows up in my door, someone suffering, a family member suffering who brings somebody in. when it company ms to treat we know there is different types of treatment, there is evidence base treatment. there is good evidence for it, we do it. there is evidence free treatment, there is no evidence whatsoever and there is evidence proof treatment. one of those evidence proof treatment is incarceration treatment. there was an office inspection in general report and eventually matt case became supervisor for it. i have been involved in other places. treatment in custody doesn't work. flash incarceration does not work. as far as the treatment that do work for alcoholism, alcoholism is a chronic disease like diabetes. hypertension and emphysema. when we look at outcomes for chronic disease, a landmark study for the journal medical association in 1999, showed that results for treatments were no worse or better than any other chronic disease model. so treatment of alcoholism and addiction works. as far
come from a country where law enforcement is part of that enslavement and human trafficking is slavery. you will not trust law enforcement in another country. sometimes victims that come from another country say i'm better off here no matter how bad it or how badly i'm abused or treated. so there's that. they begin to identify with their trafficker. everybody i get or need i have to get from this person. >> talking about that, sister, where do traffic people live? how do they live? and where do they get food? and how are they treated? >> they are often treated very poorly. they can be forced to work long hours. we had a woman that was brought to this country by friends of the family. >> that sounds like a door that we want to open. we're coming back on mosaic. stay with us. [silence]@ for those dealing with the struggles of caring for a loved one, ú we hear you. visit aarp.org/caregiving for advice and support. >>> welcome back to mosaic. and we're talking about a difficult topic, human trafficking. you've been involved in this for how many years? >> 2008. >> you won an award. you ha
campbell? that's good. those of you who don't, especially if you're in law enforce. you're probably going to want to write this down. no graph.net. randy campbell has been working in graffiti cases forever and he's a retired, i think, sheriff or highway patrolman. maybe somebody can help me out there. >> highway patrol. >> highway patrolman. what he runs it's no ground.net. for law enforcement, if you're looking for a tagger you think is crossing state boundaries and you catch one and you want to put up that person's tag to other law enforcement agencies, he's got a network where you can do that. so, you send that in to him, he sends it out and it goes to hundreds of cities. if you're looking for somebody and you think that other cities might know who that is, put that out and he'll send it out to all those cities. so, e-mail him and get on his network. he's got a website. and he's a great resource for law enforcement specifically and everybody else, too, but law enforcement specifically to help you find graffiti vandals or to add on to cases if you do find a graffiti vandal. so, this is
communicator and facilitator in the program from a law enforcement background. and the grant we get through public works really allows us to run effectively. >> great, thank you. >> [speaker not understood]. let me come on over here. what's your question? >> okay. [speaker not understood]. i've gotten three years of knowledge [speaker not understood]. my question is this. how am i going to get the police department, how am i going to get city council -- they're partially on board, but some of our people in public works are here today. how can i convey to them that i'm not a nut -- everybody here thinks i'm a nut because [speaker not understood]. how did they really take this seriously and realize that graffiti is a crime and it requires money and it requires attention from the officials, not just from covering graffiti? is there an answer? can you give me some sort of -- what's a good direction? >> [speaker not understood]. >> [speaker not understood]. basically the task force, they'll put together and try to convince the citizens something is happening, then it will go away. it's no longer
as sequestration. describing the law as quote the worst possible way to cut spending. homeland security secretary janet napolitano, housing secretary shaun donovan, and others, spoke at an event hosted by the partnership for public service. an organization that describes itself as a nonpartisan, nonprofit group focusing on improving the federal workforce. this is about an hour. >> i'm the president of the partnership for public service and i will be very brief because i that bad cold. it is a great pleasure to welcome all of you here to psr w., public service recognition week, and it is our intent that it serves as an antidote to s.b. hud which is that bashing all the time. [laughter] seriously we will never get the government we want it all we do is tear it down. amazing things are going on all the time i public servants, and we need to recognize them if we want to see them replicated by other public service. this is the period of time that has been both congressionally and presidentially determined to be the week when we focus intently on the good things that are public servants are doing to ou
memoirs, that the only she knew about was when grant had her write a letter to her sister-in-law who was actually grant's sister virginia who was married to abel corbin, who was reportedly involved in this, trying to persuade grant, and grant has her write to virginia saying, be careful. then he turns around and sells off government gold to bring that to a stop. host: martha is watching us in charleston, south carolina. caller: hi, susan. thanks again for another terrific show. you alluded to my question earlier in the show about the possible tension between julia grant and mary lincoln. then you visited the beautiful galena home that was given to the grants. i'm not sure, was it during the same time period that mary lincoln was try to get a pension out of the government, and here grant has a home given to him -- mary lincoln was in germany trying to educate her son tad, and i believe the grants later visited mary lincoln in france. guest: no, they crossed paths, but julia said she did not find out about mary lincoln being in the same town they were in until they were on their way ou
at bringing in laws. so, maybe you can create some kind of law. you're so good at that. you would be the country to start that, i would be quite certain. we have to go about 10 steps through parliament and it takes 20 years to change a law. i think you can do it overnight. [laughter] >> well, maybe. thank you. (applause) >> we have another answer. >> if i might very quickly. >> yes, of course. >> i have worked with aerosol with youth on murals as well as individual projects. i've also done collage. we've done paint pens. we have used a number of different things from silk screen t-shirts to making logos. my experience with these youth is you might engage them through graffiti. you don't have to use arrow zoll. it's expensive. it's anywhere from 8 to $14 a can wherever you get it. and you also have to then worry about protecting the eyes, the hands and the proper respirator which could be 35 to $50 apiece per youth. so, to me it's a really expensive way to engage that graffiti side of the artistic or creative behavior. at the same time, montana wants their name out there. so, if yo
discipline, but holly has come up with a really wonderful solution within law enforcement that we would love you to talk about and it's preventive and solution. >> thank you. it's not going to be a shock to you that i don't have a sizzle reel but i did manage to get a few powerpoint slides in so it's a good thing if i can get my next one. can you advance it for me please? so it is a safety course that i created with yahoo. we partnered together. i started asking questions the first day so my boots are on the ground and i'm in the schools and i love doing what i do, and i believe wholeheartedly and i believe it was the soft power -- yes, i love it. i think it's effective in so many ways, so i had luckily teamed up with the right people at yahoo who were really amazing and just the foresight they saw, and believed in the concept that law enforcement needs to be a piece of this puzzle and have some solutions. we have a unique part in the schools and with kids and this did get certified for the peace officer standards and we get credit for that being police officers and our training and o
myself about the law, i know is fast to get in there, but when the wheels are turned to come home, it's slow. i couldn't accept it. people are like they are going to do this to time. i said no, this is clear. this was what was supposed to have been done from the beginning. even my families, my loved wupz ones that lost. that made me fight more. i never gate gave up my fate. my hope is restored. >> with that i would like to thank all of our panelist. thank you. [ applause ] and we are now going to move to our second panel. while they take their seats, this idea of forced treatment versus constitutional rights has always been a tension that we've had in our criminal justice system. there is an issue that came up earlier this year that you may have read about involving this implementation of a court that was supposed to treat individuals who were suffering from long-term alcoholism. and the court was set up in a way where individuals were not being arrested for a crime but instead were being jailed for contempt of court as long as 120-150 days in jail. my office, when we learned of thi
law institute test because he could not control his behavior, congress in most state jurisdictions changed the law, got rid of the lack of emotional test, the a.l.i. test and now in most jurisdictions, the nontest requires that you demonstrate that you can't distinguish right from wrong. so now we have, and again, the law uses science for the law's own purposes, but what is problematic here is the disconnect. from the criminal side, if you lack emotional control, you go to prison because you can't win under the test because the test doesn't apply. when you walk out of prison and you lack emotional control, you get civilly committed. so what we have is a fundamental disconnect between how we view philosophy of free will and human control on the criminal side versus the civil side and not surprisingly on both sides "the state wins" because on the criminal side you go to prison and on the civil side, you get incarcerated civilly. >> i don't think that's much of a disconnect. i think -- so i agree with you the test has changed. that's not what i'm talking about. if you look at the kind
partnership in south florida with local law enforcement who had gone into schools talking about bullying, including cyber bullying and giving people concrete examples of things of situations they saw, it was remarkable. and that is why we will continue to do that work. so i hope today as we move forward you will understand that we are in this together with you at the department of justice. this is an all hands on deck enterprise. there is so much to do. i hope at the end of this day we will indeed all follow the lead of that student, walk out and say what are one or two things i'm going to do differently and better? how are we going to improve this situation? i hope if you take one and only one thing from melinda and my and ruslyn's remarks today, if you have an idea, please bring them to us. we want to learn from you. we are in this together and i want to say thank you because the most important thing we have is a recognition that you understand that this is indeed a national issue for us to deal with. i'm looking forward to the rest of the day, i appreciate your presence and i
's law in honor of her, she had been in and around sacramento for a long time. so the legislation in and of itself, i don't think it's going to work miracles, but it is definitely on people's radar now and i think you hear it in the media more and more. the reason we have a suicide barrier and the reason we are having legislation like this is because of the parents and the families because they are the ones that hurt the most and i would imagine part of the therapeutic thing, you've got to tell this story and telling it in the right place and the right time can be very effective. so seth's law does require that if you witness an act of bullying, that you must report it. >> is that for anybody? >> anyone, but particularly teachers. there is a -- sometimes we see things that aren't very pleasant and if you've ever taken it to muni, you know what i mean. your tendency is to turn away. i heard the word faggot on the play ground when i taught. the teachers were intimidated, they didn't want to be seen to have any empathy because that might reflect on them. it's crazy but that's p
'll deliver a speech surrounded by women and families already benefitting from the new law. colorado's already launching an ad campaign to get people to sign up in print and on tv. >> at connect for health colorado, you can shop, compare, pick and purchase a health plan right for you. so what actually happens when dozens of plans compete for your business? you win. >> next week republicans will vote again to repeal health care. it would be the 38th vote to roll the law back. but the first one this year. >> we've got 70 new members that have not had the opportunity to vote on the president's health care law. frankly, they have been asking for an opportunity to vote on it and we'll give to them. >> want to bring in the "washington post" and political editor. perry, what does it say that we're now three years since its passage, the president still trying to promote the law. there are ads trying to get people to sign up and be aware of it. and republicans are still trying to repeal it. seems like we're in the same place. >> i don't think we're in the same place, richard. in terms of the law itself
annenberg media ♪ annenberg media ♪ in maryland, state law protected home buyers from high interest rates. how could rapidly changing economic conditions turn that law against them? for years, general motors got the most from investments by refurbishing assembly plants. why, then, would they spend $500 million on a radically new plant? how could an idea developed by two college dropouts be worth $300 million? a fundamental incentive of our economic system is to make money. it is why we work, save, invest, and take risks. individuals and institutions alike want to maximize the money they can get from the marketplace. profits and interest-- how do you get the best return? with economic analyst richard gill, we'll investigate that question on this edition of economics usa. i'm david schoumacher. the church first decreed that charging for the use of money was sinful. the concept of usury and its immorality is found in the bible. by the middle ages, it was church law. usury came to mean excessive interest rates. limiting rates to reasonable levels was adopted as government policy. what c
a proposed law that would reduce felony drug possession crimes to a misdemeanor. this is what 13 states have done. we not only bring these issues to the forefront, but have the opportunity to participate -- and we have cards that you could fill out and questions. this promises to be a year of reform and change like we have never seen, and we now see prisoner reentry programs being implemented. we're still spending too much money and resources and not enough on rehabilitation and reentry. this november, the voters will decide on limiting the three strikes law. issues and measures long overdue. it is clear there is much more that needs to be done. according to a study that was published this month -- since 1989, 2000 people have been wrongfully incarcerated and they served collectively, 10,000 years. an average of 11 years person. i would like to thank the people who made this summit possible. memoranda -- amy devon -- many volunteers and all of our speakers and panelists. i would like to thank the co- sponsors, and the bar association of san francisco. i would like to thank them for their hel
a different perspective on it and in my view that is an issue either you are complying with the ethics laws or not. you based on the cult at consultation that you are. if someone believes differently they can file complaints or whatever they want to do. but ultimately from our perspective you have filed a form 803 in your mind and the mind of others that is sufficient although some people may disagree with thachl in terms of what is before us we have an issue of whether or not to prove the acceptance of furniture with self disclosure of these are the people who have contributed to the effort and the amount and the dates from which they have contributed and the purpose is for public disclosure so members of the public can draw whatever conclusions they want about different done donors or different amount. i'm comfortable of supporting the acceptance of the gift. everything is out on the public domain and people can have whatever opinion they want to have about that. and given that, it would be one thing if you came in and said you haven't filed anything and you said i don't know that i'm r
both low income tax or no taxes coupled with right to work laws. hand in hand those laws will over time. few people do if you are really wealthy you think about that most americans think that is what you know goes hand in hand with these tax policies. that's why they are so critical for policy makers to get right. >> states seem to be doubling down on both good and bad policies? >> that's right. you have states like minnesota that have been talking about a snow bird tax raising marginal tax rates up here you have those kinds of states not doing as well. >> governor dayton says, these people are going to florida and arizona and in the winter, but they are minnesota people. we should get a little pedalling for that. i could see the thinking. if the disposable income was truly captive within your zip code, within your city, that might work, but what we know about career mobility today now more than ever is that people can and do move. they do pursue those jobs and where their income is most welcome. >> the states keep raising these taxes thinking they will get more money and they get less.
that the law would recognize. so the law all of the time develops concepts that scientists are interested in studying. it might be competency, for example. well, competency is really a multifaceted construct from a legal perspective. it could be competency to be executed, it could be competency to commit a crime. it could be competency to contribute to the decision as to whether voluntarily commit yourself to a mental hospital. it could be competency to participate in an abortion decision. so competency means many different things. the first thing you have to do as a scientist is ask the question, well, what does the law mean by it because if you want me to measure it, i have to somehow apply it. so going back to the question of free will, because a scientist can't operationally define it, they can't measure it, they're not really that much use to legal debates about free will. now, what does it mean on the legal side? i actually think the idea of free will or what is often referred to as volitional control plays a very big part in legal systems, but i think in the legal systems, we don't
but many of our most important nontrade law, food safety, regulation, the environment and more. this is intimately connected to fast track. number two, fast track has totally upended the balance of power, and it basically shredded a vital check and balance built into the constitution by the founders, dangerously concentrating what turns out to be vast power to unilaterally impose policies in a process that is heavily influenced by large corporations. fast track, among other things, officially empowered over 600 official corporate advisers who have access to taxes so secret congress doesn't see them, and to have direct input, and even to the public citizen, the organization where i work, is very focused, for 40 years on good process, good policy, fast track is even worse than the usual bad process, in that what it has basically allowed is a formalization of the use of trade agreements to, in a slow motion coup d'etat, quiet lie take over -- quietly take over democratic policies that vital to meet the challenges of 21st 21st century. some of husband started think, all right, this
, the most successful stacey will see both no income tax are very low taxes coupled with right to work laws. hand-in-hand, hands down those states will succeed every time. it is of some months the people think there is no income-tax. that's when the best and enhance. >> so critically important. john: he noticed the states seem to be doubling down on both good and bad policies. >> that's right. you have states like minnesota that have been talking about a snowbird tax, raising marginal tax rates. you have those candidates not doing as well. john: governor dayton says these people are going to florida and arizona in the winter. but minnesota people. we should get a little penalty for that. i concede that thinking. >> of the disposable income was truly captive within is a cut and city, that my work. will we know about career mobility the day now more than ever is that people can and do move and they do pursue those jobs and where their income is most welcome. john: the state keep raising the taxes that unit will get more money in the get less. they never learn. >> that should not be a surprise
foie gras. >> we have a new undercover investigation. >> the farm is now closed because the law makes it illegal to force-feed ducks for foie gras. when the tip came in that restaurants are still selling it and breaking the law, we went undercover. you should now this video does include pictures of force-feeding. the tippen that came in said order the poached pair and you'll get foie gras. we sent in two producers. and before they could even ask, the server made an offer. >> she said our very last offer is a secret, but this much i can tell you about it. it's a traditional french dishes. >> when we placed our order, she slipped. >> she said three special courses -- and she catches herself and says huckleberry. >> reporter: there it was, foie gras. banned in california since last year. >> i said why is it a secret dish? and she says because of california law. >> reporter: we showed video shot by activists at the state's only foie gras farm. a worker shoved a metal pump down a duck's throat and a pump shot up to a pound of corn into a duck. >> we didn't know as we walked in we were goin
a new undercover investigation. >> the farm is now closed because the law makes it illegal to force-feed ducks for foie gras. when the tip came in that restaurants are still selling it and breaking the law, we went undercover. you should now this video does include pictures of force-feeding. the tippen that came in said order the poached pair and you'll get foie gras. we sent in two producers. and before they could even ask, the server made an offer. >> she said our very last offer is a secret, but this much i can tell you about it. it's a traditional french dishes. >> when we placed our order, she slipped. >> she said three special courses -- and she catches herself and says huckleberry. >> reporter: there it was, foie gras. banned in california since last year. >> i said why is it a secret dish? and she says because of california law. >> reporter: we showed video shot by activists at the state's only foie gras farm. a worker metalshoved a metal pu nd a pump shot up to a pound of corn into a duck. >> we didn't know as we walked in we were going to encounter sick birds, dead birds,
. >> the farm is now closed because the law makes it illegal to force-feed ducks for foie gras. when the tip came in that restaurants are still selling it and breaking the law, we went undercover. you should now this video does include pictures of force-feeding. the tippen that came in said order the poached pair and you'll get foie gras. we sent in two producers. and before they could even ask, the server made an offer. >> she said our very last offer is a secret, but this much i can tell you about it. it's a traditional french dishes. >> when we placed our order, she slipped. >> she said three special courses -- and she catches herself and says huckleberry. >> reporter: there it was, foie gras. banned in california since last year. >> i said why is it a secret dish? and she says because of california law. >> reporter: we showed video shot by activists at the state's only foie gras farm. a worker shoved a metal pump down a duck's throat and a pump shot up to a pound of corn into a duck. >> we didn't know as we walked in we were going to encounter sick birds, dead birds, birds with open, fes
shot directors emerging to watch, she's also graduated from georgetown university law center and practicing attorney and abc television networks before starting her television career and next is john. i met john about 10 years ago when he was starting off and had this crazy idea of operating a training center for public defenders and he did. he's no now the president and founder and one of the contributors to gideon's army, he's from john marshall law school where he teaches law and criminal procedure. he was in the post katrina and new orleans center. he trained people in the film. he received an advocacy fellowship and named a public interest fellow by harvard law school. next we have maurice call well. he was convicted in the housing project here in san francisco. there was no physical evidence linking him to the crime yet he was still convicted based on the false testimony of a single neighbor. he was sentence to life behind bars. in prison mr. colwell contacted the center for help and located two witnesses who saw the murder and said mr. colwell was not involved in any
which he fought for so long in the justice. the decision was law of the land. equal justice under law. >> when a supreme court decided the gideon case, they really brought light to that phrase. it doesn't matter if you are rich, it doesn't matter if you are poor, you get the same equal chance. >> just look at what happened to gideon. the supreme court didn't set gideon free but it gave him a fair trial with a competent attorney. >> not guilty. >> clarence earl gideon was a free man. the man who won a landmark supreme court case went to live a normal living with a job pumping gas. >> when i read where it says equal justice under law, i'm very inspired by that. i'm very comforted by that. but i know a lot of people are treated unfairly. i see it as something encouraging but i don't see it yet. >> it's written into constitution and established into the goal for society to reach for and live up to. people will fall short, rights can be ignored or even trampled. with nothing more than a pencil and knowledge. >> if you know your rights you can protect your rights. if you don't know your r
is president obama launching a new battle over a signature health care law? some people in his own party are calling it a train wreck and a proud morning for america. the new world trade center soars to new heights. >> we begin with a look at today's eye opener your world in 90 seconds. >>> the horrific brutality and torture that the victims endured for a decade is beyond comprehension. >> prosecutors may seek the death penalty in the cleveland kidnapping case. >> michelle knight was beaten so badly, she may need facial reconstruction. >> a candle light vigil after a trying week. >> from bangladesh rescuers found a survivor more than two weeks after the collapse of a garment factory building. >> president obama trying to bolster support for health care reform law, in a speech this afternoon from the white house. >> obama care is going to drive up the costs. i want to repeal the loft -- law of the land is that clear? >> what investigators are looking at an accident in the san francisco bay, that killed one sailor. >> and prince harry pays respects for service members k
? when you get down to it they are breaking it the law. host: it has to be said the groups are looked at for their tax exempt status. re how theyon't cai vote. host: off of facebook this morning. we are getting your reactions this morning to the irs apologizing for targeting tea party and a true type groups. the numbers are on your screen. we will hear from victor in silver spring, maryland on our republican line. caller: there should be an oversight hearing in the house took a poll tax situation. many of your how audience realizes that next year the irs is going to be running obamacare. if you think it is bad paying taxes now, it is coming. to beberals are goign to bng the first to scream. host: what you think of this recent activity? caller: it does not surprise me, obama has had an enemy list for a long time. unlike nixon he is willing to do something about it. host: as far as investigations into this matter and things along that nature, should that take place? caller: exactly. the irs is getting too powerful and they are going to come down on the wrong people one of these days. i
opposing this? >> well, listen the democrats don't want to ange labor laws that have been around since 19 8. essentially i think what is happening the gop is trying to come up with a bill that appeals to middle class working families. think they have a lot of work to do if this is the idea they come up with because the senate will probably veto or not pass it. the president will probably veto it. and thing is, it is aimed at 40 hour plus worker, right? the guy or woman who works 40 hours. i get that i'm okay with giving private sector the option. i just don't know you need a law to do it. you're right, it feels like the bureaucrats in washington, d.c. are monkeying around with labor law when they don't need to do it. let the company come up with this on their own. >> here's the problem. the problem right now if you're working more than 40 hours the law provides you are obligated to do it. so the employer must pay that 1.5 times the salary for every hour over 40. dennis: exactly. >> why should that be the law? why can't the private sector have that option? dennis: isn't this bill really aime
of constitution and bill of rights. there are 22,000 gun-control laws out there, most of which are not even enforced and what add more to it? it will not do any good if you do not enforce the ones you have now. that there are no background checks at gun shows, that is false. private sales between individuals, yes there's no background check there. you dogo to a gun show have to pass a background check or have it submitted at that time because only licensed dealers can sell at those places legally. there is a lot of misinformation out there. it is appalling but as i said the bottom line is the integrity of the constitution and bill of rights. can they just be cast aside? or are they worth the paper they are written on? the other thing that is kind of worrysome is this talk about registrations and confis cation. i do not know how that will work. here's my theory on it, if you license a constitutional liberty it ceases to become a liberty thebecomes a privilege at hand of government. last thing i want to make a comment on is an old saying, outlawed, only outlaws will have guns." both are very
into the forum on law culture and society spring conversation. and this one is very different for us, and part because we are being hosted with the book many of the city bar association. of course, we have c-span. how cool is that. so you're all a part of this, and rare privilege or year. we have very interesting, a distinguished group of special guests, and i will introduce the berkeley and then we will set up the theme for the 9mb in the conversation. starting off to my far right is one of america's best known criminal defense attorneys. his most recent success and one of the classic once, the celebrated benjamin brafman, the defense of dominique strauss-kahn. everyone please welcome benjamin brafman. [applause] and this woman to my right, very lovely, kathleen hogan domaingyy that look at, but she is thegqgy toughest prosecutor in new yorky state.gygygygygygygy she was actually just recentlygy selected as the best prosecutor in new york state. she is the district attorney for warren county up in lake george. it seems like a mile area, but they have crime. nobody messes with her. and so she
of the change in law that my friend wants to see happen will cost an enormous amount of money, millions of dollars. and the coburn amendment doesn't address the costs and normally he would company do that in an amendment. the costs that -- the corps would incur in order to train their workers to carry weapons or hire outside security at that. so i appreciate and respect the views of my friend, but i also think that this is something we shouldn't do today on this bill now. especially when we're seeing a lot of talk about more home-grown terrorism. we want to protect our infrastructure. now, it may be that -- that the corps ought to look at more protection of these facilities. i'm willing to look at that. but i do think we're making a problem where there isn't a problem. people can go on corps land and use their guns for hunting and fishing, recreation, target shooting, and i think that's working out fine. this seems to be an amendment that's solving a problem that, frankly, doesn't exist. at least i looked -- i have 38 million people in my state, it's a lot of people. i asked do we have
from? >> guest: well, that's part of the law, and it's been part of common law since 1841 and part of the copyright act since 1976. >> host: what's an example of fair use today? >> guest: well, fair use is done by students everywhere when they quote a scholar or an encyclopedia or wiki media or my other source in their paper. they get to use those words as a result of fair use. journalists do it every day when they say the think tank report said this, quote. they're able to use that material is all copyrighted, but they're able to use it. >> host: because they source it? >> guest: no. actually, sourcing doesn't have anything to do with fair use, although it is always a polite thing to do, to give credit to people. but credit, there's many examples of fair use where you wouldn't even -- you, in fact, never need to give credit in order to be within the copyright law. >> host: such as? >> guest: you would make people upset if you didn't frequently. but any kind of challenge that an artist makes, for instance, uses material from lots of different places and doesn't necessarily cite it.
Search Results 0 to 49 of about 1,312 (some duplicates have been removed)